Modern jurisprudence embodies two distinct traditions of thought about the nature of law. The first adopts a scientific approach which assumes that all legal phenomena possess universal characteristics that may be used in the analysis of any type of legal system. The main task of the legal philosopher is to disclose and understand such characteristics,which are thought to be capable of establishment independently of any moral or political values which the law might promote, and of any other context-dependent features of legal systems. Another form of jurisprudential reflection views the law as a complex form of moral arrangement which can only be analysed from within a system of reflective moral and political practices. Rather than conducting a search for neutral standpoints or criteria, this second form of theorising suggests that we uncover the nature and purpose of the law by reflecting on the dynamic properties of legal practice. The journal remembers a wide scope of fields for its order to make a stage for the creators to make their commitment towards the journal and the publication office promises a companion audit process for the submitted manuscripts for the nature of distributing. Journal of Legal Sciences is an Open Access journal and expects to distribute generally complete and solid wellspring of data on the disclosures and current advancements in the method of unique articles, review articles, case reports, communications, and so on in every aspect of the field and making them unreservedly accessible through online with no limitations or some other memberships to researchers around the world.